Home / Practice Areas / Pet Law

Pet Law Attorney in New York

New York treats companion animals as personal property, while requiring courts awarding possession in divorce to consider the animal’s best interest. Outside divorce, courts have also considered care and welfare alongside ownership evidence.

The law has never known quite what to do with animals. They are property in the legal sense — you buy them, you own them, they can be replaced in the eyes of a court that is calculating damages. Everyone who has lived with one knows that description is wrong, and the law has only recently started to catch up.

New York took a real step in 2021. In a divorce, a court is no longer confined to asking who paid for the dog. It must consider what is best for the animal.

That change is narrow — it applies to divorce — but it signals a direction, and it makes a meaningful difference in the cases it covers.

What this covers

Pets in Divorce — the best interest standard and how possession is actually decided
Pet Ownership & Care Agreements — written arrangements between co-owners, breeders, and shared households
Pet Custody Between Unmarried Owners — what happens after a breakup, where the divorce standard does not apply
Pet Trusts — funded, enforceable provision for an animal after your death under EPTL 7-8.1

Why animals sit awkwardly in the law

Because the categories do not fit.

Treating an animal as property produces results people find intolerable — that a dog goes to whoever holds the receipt, or that the loss of a fifteen-year companion is measured by what a replacement costs.

Treating an animal as a child does not work either. The child-custody framework does not automatically apply to pets. Some courts have ordered shared pet possession, but continuing judicial supervision is not a guaranteed remedy.

New York has moved toward a middle position for divorce: still property, but property whose interests the court must weigh. Understanding where that line sits is most of what this area involves.

What actually decides these cases

In most disputes, the answer turns on evidence rather than sentiment. What matters:

Ownership records — adoption or purchase paperwork, microchip registration, licensing, and who is named at the veterinarian
Care history — who fed, walked, trained, and paid for the animal, and who took it to appointments
Living arrangements — where the animal is settled, and which household can genuinely care for it
Written agreements — the single most effective way to avoid the dispute entirely

The last point is worth saying plainly: an agreement made while everyone is on good terms is worth more than any argument made afterward. See Care Agreements.

Frequently asked questions

Are pets considered property in New York?

Yes, animals are legally personal property. Since 2021, however, a court deciding possession of a companion animal in a divorce must also consider the best interest of the animal.

Who gets the pet in a New York divorce?

The court considers the best interest of the companion animal alongside ownership. Care history, who the animal is bonded to, and which household can provide for it all matter. See Pets in Divorce.

Who keeps the dog when an unmarried couple breaks up?

The matrimonial statute does not govern an unmarried breakup. Ownership evidence matters, and courts outside divorce have also considered care and animal welfare under a “best for all concerned” approach. See Pet Custody Between Unmarried Owners.

Can I leave money to my pet in my will?

Not directly, because animals are property and property cannot own property. New York permits a pet trust under EPTL 7-8.1, which funds care and is enforceable. See Pet Trusts.

Can I get visitation with a pet after a breakup?

New York courts do not generally administer ongoing visitation schedules for animals. A written agreement between the parties is the practical route to a shared arrangement.

Written by Dale Riedel, Esq. · Admitted in New York, Bar No. 5837539 · Last reviewed October 6, 2026

Situations we handle

Where people usually start.

You want an estate plan that provides properly for a companion animal after your death.

You are separating and need an arrangement for a pet you both consider family.

There is a genuine dispute about who owns or should care for an animal.

You have been left an animal under a will and are unsure what that obliges you to do.

You want to understand what New York law actually says before assuming an outcome.

Where it goes wrong

The mistakes that cost the most.

Relying on an informal promise

Asking a friend or relative to take an animal is a wish, not an instrument. Without a properly structured provision and money attached to it, the arrangement depends entirely on goodwill at exactly the moment goodwill is under strain.

Assuming attachment decides it

Loving the animal more is not the test. Records of acquisition, veterinary bills, licensing and day-to-day care carry weight that feelings do not, and they are far easier to assemble before a dispute than during one.

Leaving no provision for cost

An animal’s care outlasts the goodwill of whoever inherits it if there is no funding attached. Provision that names a carer but not a source of money tends to fail quietly, some years later.

Our process

How the matter moves.

Tell us about the animal

The circumstances, the people involved, and what you want to happen. In your own words.

Establish the position

What the records show, what New York law provides, and what outcomes are realistically available.

Agree the approach

A written scope and fee, so a matter of this size never costs more than it should.

Draft or negotiate

A trust or provision that will actually function, or an arrangement negotiated between the people involved.

Make it hold

Documents drafted to be enforceable and funded to be practical, so the arrangement survives contact with reality.

Begin

Speak with Dale Riedel.

Tell us what is happening in a few sentences. We will tell you whether it is something we handle, what the realistic options are, and what it costs to find out more.